The Douche Administration Part 1

"Eleven days before President Bush's January 28, 2003, State of the Union address in which he said that the U.S. learned from British intelligence that Iraq had attempted to acquire uranium from Africa -- an explosive claim that helped pave the way to war -- the State Department told the CIA that the intelligence the uranium claims were based upon were forgeries, according to a newly declassified State Department memo." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041706Y.shtml
--"the first piece of hard evidence and the strongest to date that the Bush administration manipulated and ignored intelligence information in their zeal to win public support for invading Iraq."

47% of the population strongly disapprove of the president
63% disapprove

That's worse than when Clinton lied about having an affair! Wait... what's worse? Screwing an intern, or screwing the country? Still won't make me happy until everyone in America realizes that these "neocons" are completely out of their minds. But that won't ever happen as long as the mainstream media ignores these kinds of stories. If you aren't pissed off about this you're not paying close enough attention to it.


Bush: "I don't think we ever said... at least I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September 11th and Saddam Hussein." -Press Conference '06

"The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein. Because of Al Qaeda connections, because of his history, he's a danger to the American people and we gotta deal with him. We gotta deal with him before it's too late." -- Speech November '02
"Saddam aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda." -- Speech '03
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/03/20.html#a7595

I know it's hard to believe Mr. President, but they have these things that actually record what you say and are able to play back what they record.... Yes even after a long period of time.


As soon as 9/11 happened neo-conservatives and powerful political figures blamed Osama Bin Laden. When they couldn't find him, they decided to focus they're thirst for war on someone else. That someone was Saddam Hussein; who happened to have an extremely weak military and whose country also just happens to be positioned geographically on one of the most oil rich regions in the world. The U.S. has always had very strong strategic interests in the middle-east ever since we started running out of our own oil in the 40's and 50's.

They thought: We can tell the american people that Iraq is part of the war on terrorism, that Saddam is somehow linked to al qaeda, and that he has nuclear weapons. They felt that they could actually manipulate the american people's grief, their suffering, their anger and their fear in such a way as to enable them to carry out something that they had been planning since 1997. 9/11 was a perfect pretext for them. But it had nothing to do with the reality of September 11th and nothing to do with the reality of their own assertions, which all turned out to be completely false.

Think about this: If Saddam Hussein was an actual threat to the United States, why was it so easy for us to take him out? Why didn't he use any of the WMD's that "he had" against us when we invaded him? Why did he run into a spider hole scared for his life?

The answer is simple.... He had no military. Iraq's economy had been in shambles since the first gulf war. After the war, the U.S. and our allies put economic sanctions on Iraq. A nation's military depends on it's economy. Every single piece of intelligence that we had on his military capabilities showed that he had none.

George W. Bush is a liar, Dick Cheney is a liar, Condileeza Rice is a liar, Colin Powell was/is a liar, and Donald Rumsfeld is definetly a liar. The Bush administration lies, lies, lies. They LIE A LOT.... seriously it's becoming a problem. They call all the shots, regardless of the facts and common sense; making absolutely no apologies. Just today, amidst criticism and calls for Rumsfeld's resignation by several military generals, Bush had this to say:

"I hear the voices and I read the front page and I know the speculation. But I'm the decider and I decide what's best. And what's best is for Don Rumsfeld to remain as the secretary of defense."

A true American patriot once said: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
---- Theodore Roosevelt